IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v31y2022i4p492-524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IS incident recovery and service value: a service-dominant logic view

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad S. Najjar
  • William J. Kettinger
  • Lynda D. Kettinger

Abstract

IS service delivery failures inside companies are value diminishing events. Information systems service providers seek to limit this value destruction but lack guidance on IS incident resolution actions that satisfy users and preserve IS service value. We apply Service-Dominant Logic (SDL) to explore what is relevant to users’ recovery service experiences while interacting with IS service providers. We use an integrated research approach including qualitative and quantitative data. We uncover actions that lead to a satisfying incident recovery and categorise them into three recovery components (responsive handling interactions, supportive communicating interactions, and effective resolving actions) that reflect IS provider resource exchanges of information, knowledge, and service skills with users in resolving incidents. We integrate these three recovery components as factors in our research model and test direct and moderating effects on value outcomes. We find that users’ recovery satisfaction results from both a “fix it fast and fully” perspective and a sense of effort and fairness conveyed. Results point to managers preserving overall IS service satisfaction and service quality by facilitating proper resource exchanges during an incident recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad S. Najjar & William J. Kettinger & Lynda D. Kettinger, 2022. "IS incident recovery and service value: a service-dominant logic view," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 492-524, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:492-524
    DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1869915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1869915
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1869915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:492-524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.