IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v29y2020i6p688-703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ingredients for successful badges: evidence from a field experiment in bike commuting

Author

Listed:
  • Zachary J. Sheffler
  • De Liu
  • Shawn P. Curley

Abstract

Despite the popularity of badges in gamification applications, there is a lack of research on how to design badges to increase target behaviour. Motivated by this gap, we conduct a large-scale field experiment in a commuting-by-bicycle programme to explore efficacies of different badge designs in motivating ridership. We systematically vary the rewards, signifiers, and completion logic components of badges. We find adding an option for sharing a badge on Facebook, as a reward for badge attainment, increases ridership. Changing the badge signifier from a self-interested frame to a pro-environmental frame does not make a difference. Changing completion logic from a fixed to a relative goal increases ridership only among frequent riders. These findings have direct implications for gamification design and provide useful directions for research into the motivations behind the design elements.

Suggested Citation

  • Zachary J. Sheffler & De Liu & Shawn P. Curley, 2020. "Ingredients for successful badges: evidence from a field experiment in bike commuting," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 688-703, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:29:y:2020:i:6:p:688-703
    DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808539
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:29:y:2020:i:6:p:688-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.