IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v24y2015i1p107-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research

Author

Listed:
  • Juhani Iivari

Abstract

This paper distinguishes and contrasts two design science research strategies in information systems. In the first strategy, a researcher constructs or builds an IT meta-artefact as a general solution concept to address a class of problem. In the second strategy, a researcher attempts to solve a client’s specific problem by building a concrete IT artefact in that specific context and distils from that experience prescriptive knowledge to be packaged into a general solution concept to address a class of problem. The two strategies are contrasted along 16 dimensions representing the context, outcomes, process and resource requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Juhani Iivari, 2015. "Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 107-115, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:24:y:2015:i:1:p:107-115
    DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2013.35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/ejis.2013.35
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/ejis.2013.35?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tobias Wulfert, 2023. "Boundary resource management in innovation ecosystems: The case of e-commerce," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Dedi I. Inan & Ghassan Beydoun & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2022. "Disaster Management Knowledge Analysis Framework Validated," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2077-2097, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:24:y:2015:i:1:p:107-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.