IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/titdxx/v26y2020i4p811-836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring university perceptions of IS implementation and attributes of success: a case study of public universities in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Ananchanok Watchaton
  • Donyaprueth Krairit

Abstract

This study aims to gain a better understanding of public university implementation of organizational information systems (IS). Mixed methods research was used, including initial exploration, telephone interviews, and a self-administered mail survey. The data were gathered from university personnel at 40 public universities in Thailand, and the research focused on the university student-registration systems (S-R). The study results highlight the different perceptions between two response groups: administrators and system users. The results show different perceptions of IS implementation and attributes that define IS implementation success. The results also serve as important suggestions that need to be recognized by administrators and practitioners for effectively planning the implementation of organizational IS in public universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ananchanok Watchaton & Donyaprueth Krairit, 2020. "Exploring university perceptions of IS implementation and attributes of success: a case study of public universities in Thailand," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 811-836, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:26:y:2020:i:4:p:811-836
    DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2019.1643281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02681102.2019.1643281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02681102.2019.1643281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:26:y:2020:i:4:p:811-836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/titd20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.