IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/titdxx/v24y2018i1p138-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building theory in ICT4D evaluation: a comprehensive approach to assessing outcome and impact

Author

Listed:
  • Hafeni Mthoko
  • Caroline Khene

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) act as tools for social change and development; however, there is still limited empirical evidence that demonstrates this. An outcome and impact assessment based on a comprehensive (holistic) evaluation is deemed appropriate at a time when many ICT4D programs fail to effectively demonstrate their impact toward rural development and how that impact came about. The purpose of this research is to identify the components for an outcome and impact assessment framework that is based on a comprehensive approach to evaluation. The authors applied a theoretical approach using Weicks theorizing process to develop the framework. The theoretical approach analyzed existing outcome and impact assessment frameworks from different fields beyond ICT4D. The output of this research proposed five key outcome and impact themes, which are informed by preceding domains of evaluation, essential for the assessment of ICT4D programs. These themes include Strategic Value, Most Significant Change, Empowerment, Livelihoods and Sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hafeni Mthoko & Caroline Khene, 2018. "Building theory in ICT4D evaluation: a comprehensive approach to assessing outcome and impact," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 138-164, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:138-164
    DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2017.1315359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02681102.2017.1315359
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02681102.2017.1315359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:138-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/titd20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.