IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/titdxx/v22y2016i1p36-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientometric Study of the Progress and Development of e-Government Research During the Period 2000--2012

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar
  • Laura Alcaide Muñoz
  • Antonio M. López Hernández

Abstract

Many countries have implemented changes in public-sector management models, based on the strategic and intensive use of new information and communication technologies. From a critical standpoint, this paper analyzes and characterizes the contributions made by research in the field of e-government, identifying future areas of interest and potentially valuable methodologies. In addition, it compares research efforts focused on developing countries with those concerning developed economies, in order to identify research gaps and possibilities for improvement in the context of e-government research in developing countries. Diverse scientometric approaches are employed in this analysis of papers published by international journals listed in the SSCI index in the fields of Public Administration and of Information Science & Library Science. Our findings reveal the existence of various research gaps and highlight areas that should be addressed in future research, especially in developing countries. Indeed, the research approach to e-government remains immature, focusing on particular cases or dimensions, while little has been done to produce theories or models to clarify and explain the political processes of e-government. In addition, significant differences are found between the impact of scientific output and patterns of scientific production as regards developing and developed countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar & Laura Alcaide Muñoz & Antonio M. López Hernández, 2016. "Scientometric Study of the Progress and Development of e-Government Research During the Period 2000--2012," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 36-74, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:22:y:2016:i:1:p:36-74
    DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2014.927340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02681102.2014.927340
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02681102.2014.927340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:22:y:2016:i:1:p:36-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/titd20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.