IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v8y2019i2p117-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the patient discharge process: implementing actions derived from a soft systems methodology study

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Emes
  • Stella Smith
  • Suzanne Ward
  • Alan Smith

Abstract

In the period from January 2013 to July 2014, three process change initiatives were undertaken at a major UK hospital to improve the patient discharge process. These initiatives were inspired by the findings of a study of the discharge process using Soft Systems Methodology. The first initiative simplified time-consuming paperwork and the second introduced more regular reviews of patient progress through daily multi-disciplinary “Situation Reports”. These two initiatives were undertaken in parallel across the hospital, and for the average patient they jointly led to a 41% reduction between a patient being declared medically stable and their being discharged from the hospital. The third initiative implemented more proactive alerting of Social Care Practitioners to patients with probable social care needs at the front door, and simplified capture of important patient information (using a “SPRING” form). This initiative saw a 20% reduction in total length of stay for 88 patients on three wards where the SPRING form was used, whilst 248 patients on five control wards saw no significant change in total length of stay in the same period. Taken together, these initiatives have reduced total length of stay by 67% from 55.8 days to 18.6 days for the patients studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Emes & Stella Smith & Suzanne Ward & Alan Smith, 2019. "Improving the patient discharge process: implementing actions derived from a soft systems methodology study," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 117-133, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:117-133
    DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2018.1524405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20476965.2018.1524405
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20476965.2018.1524405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:117-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.