IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v21y2021i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deepening transparency about value-laden assumptions in energy and environmental modelling: improving best practices for both modellers and non-modellers

Author

Listed:
  • John Bistline
  • Mark Budolfson
  • Blake Francis

Abstract

Transparency and openness are broadly endorsed in energy and environmental modelling and analysis, but too little attention is given to the transparency of value-laden assumptions. Current practices for transparency focus on making model source code and data available, documenting key equations and parameter values, and ensuring replicability of results. We argue that, even when followed, these guidelines are insufficient for achieving deep transparency, in the sense that results often remain driven by implicit value-laden assumptions that are opaque to other modellers and researchers, and that may not be understood by wider audiences to be controversial. This paper identifies additional best practices for achieving transparency by highlighting issues where disagreement over value judgements will persist for the foreseeable future. Recommendations for deepening transparency are developed by learning from successes and ongoing challenges represented in three case studies. We provide recommendations to accelerate the adoption of additional best practices for deepening transparency of energy and environmental modelling in policy-relevant domains, increasing stakeholder participation with non-modellers, and encouraging interdisciplinary dialogue.Key policy insights Achieving all of the goals associated with transparency requires more than current practices of providing open source data, code, and model documentation.Greater interdisciplinary dialogue could improve transparency beyond current practices, including in model development, application, and communications.Better practices for addressing contentious and value-laden assumptions include providing accessible documentation for non-specialists, increasing policymaker participation to ensure that model outputs can inform questions, and performing sensitivity analyses that cover a range of reasonable views about value-laden assumptions.Energy and environmental modellers should account for audience-specific considerations to promote transparency, especially accounting for needs of non-modellers such as policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • John Bistline & Mark Budolfson & Blake Francis, 2021. "Deepening transparency about value-laden assumptions in energy and environmental modelling: improving best practices for both modellers and non-modellers," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1781048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2020.1781048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2020.1781048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fodstad, Marte & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hellemo, Lars & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Pisciella, Paolo & Silvast, Antti & Bordin, Chiara & Schmidt, Sarah & Straus, Julian, 2022. "Next frontiers in energy system modelling: A review on challenges and the state of the art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Pablo E. Carvajal & Asami Miketa & Nadeem Goussous & Pauline Fulcheri, 2022. "Best Practice in Government Use and Development of Long-Term Energy Transition Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.