IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v40y2021i5p445-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human beings and robots: are there any differences in the attribution of punishments for the same crimes?

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Guidi
  • Enrica Marchigiani
  • Sergio Roncato
  • Oronzo Parlangeli

Abstract

As collaborative robots and artificial intelligence (AI) systems are being deployed in ever-increasing contexts, we are more and more called upon to make judgements on their moral behaviour. Understanding the factors, affecting our ethical judgements involving these types of agents, would thus seem of the uttermost importance to allow for safer and well-regulated interactions between humans and machines. So far, however, this topic has been rarely investigated. We compared the perception of the seriousness of an action committed by either a person or a robot, causing harm to either some persons or some robots, and the attribution of the appropriated punishment for that action. The results showed a significant effect of the type of victim: the action was considered more a serious offence, and deemed worthy of more severe punishment, if the victims were humans than if they were robots. A significant agent-by-victim interaction was also found in the punishment judgements: for human victims, a human agent was punished more severely than a robot, while for robot victims, a robot agent was attributed a more severe punishment than a human one. The results are discussed in the light of the theories linking moral judgements to mind perception.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Guidi & Enrica Marchigiani & Sergio Roncato & Oronzo Parlangeli, 2021. "Human beings and robots: are there any differences in the attribution of punishments for the same crimes?," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 445-453, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:5:p:445-453
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1905879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1905879
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1905879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:5:p:445-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.