IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v40y2021i2p146-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the motivators affecting doctors’ contributions in online healthcare communities: professional status as a moderator

Author

Listed:
  • Hualong Yang
  • Helen S. Du
  • Wei He
  • Han Qiao

Abstract

With the development of e-health, the number of doctors providing consultation services in online healthcare communities (OHCs) is growing. Their aim is to help patients obtain healthcare information and treatment. Since the doctors’ contributions are essential to a sustainable development of OHCs, understanding why doctors contribute to OHCs is crucial. However, the related literature that investigate motivators of doctors’ contribution behaviours in OHCs is scant. OHCs are a type of novel online community through which doctors not only obtain personal compensation but also interact with patients to build their relationship network. Hence, both personal and social motivators may affect doctors’ contributions to OHCs. Based on the theories of self-determination and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, we established an empirical model to explore the effects of reputation, monetary rewards, doctor–patient interaction and professional status. The empirical results show that both personal and social motivators have positive effects on doctors’ contributions to OHCs, and that doctors’ professional status has a moderating effect. These findings help us understand the motivational mechanisms of doctors’ contributions to OHCs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hualong Yang & Helen S. Du & Wei He & Han Qiao, 2021. "Understanding the motivators affecting doctors’ contributions in online healthcare communities: professional status as a moderator," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 146-160, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:2:p:146-160
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1679887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1679887
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1679887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenjuan Fan & Qiqi Zhou & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2023. "Should Doctors Open Online Consultation Services? An Empirical Investigation of Their Impact on Offline Appointments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 629-651, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:2:p:146-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.