IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v38y2019i10p1038-1047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive ergonomics for data analysis. Experimental study of cognitive limitations in a data-based judgement task

Author

Listed:
  • Virpi Kalakoski
  • Andreas Henelius
  • Emilia Oikarinen
  • Antti Ukkonen
  • Kai Puolamäki

Abstract

Today’s ever-increasing amount of data places new demands on cognitive ergonomics and requires new design ideas to ensure successful human–data interaction. Our aim was to identify the cognitive factors that must be considered when designing systems to improve decision-making based on large amounts of data. We constructed a task that simulates the typical cognitive demands people encounter in data analysis situations. We demonstrate some essential cognitive limitations using a behavioural experiment with 20 participants. The studied task presented the participants with critical and noncritical attributes that contained information on two groups of people. They had to select the response option (group) with the higher level of critical attributes. The results showed that accuracy of judgement decreased as the amount of information increased, and that judgement was affected by irrelevant information. Our results thus demonstrate critical cognitive limitations when people utilise data and suggest a cognitive bias in data-based decision-making. Therefore, when designing for cognition, we should consider the human cognitive limitations that are manifested in a data analysis context. Furthermore, we need general cognitive ergonomic guidelines for design that support the utilisation of data and improve data-based decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Virpi Kalakoski & Andreas Henelius & Emilia Oikarinen & Antti Ukkonen & Kai Puolamäki, 2019. "Cognitive ergonomics for data analysis. Experimental study of cognitive limitations in a data-based judgement task," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 1038-1047, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:10:p:1038-1047
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1657181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1657181
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1657181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:10:p:1038-1047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.