IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v36y2017i5p548-556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How virtual reality affects perceived learning effectiveness: a task–technology fit perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Zhang
  • Shan Jiang
  • Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos
  • Miltiadis D. Lytras
  • Yongqiang Sun

Abstract

The application of virtual reality (VR) in improving users’ learning outcomes, especially in perceived learning effectiveness, is a new area. VR provides visualisation and interaction within a virtual world that closely resembles a real world, bringing an immersive study experience. It also has two special features: representational fidelity and immediacy of control. However, only when the technology fits the tasks that users are performing will it be adopted. In addition, technology itself cannot improve learning outcomes; certain learning behaviours, such as reflective thinking, should be prompted first so that learning outcomes can be improved. The research hypotheses derived from this model have empirically been validated using the responses to a survey among 180 users. These responses have been examined through SmartPLS 2.0. Surprisingly, task–technology fit does not moderate the relationship between VR and technology quality and the relationship between VR and technology accessibility. From this study, we can conclude that VR will influence reflective thinking and further indirectly improve perceived learning effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Zhang & Shan Jiang & Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos & Miltiadis D. Lytras & Yongqiang Sun, 2017. "How virtual reality affects perceived learning effectiveness: a task–technology fit perspective," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 548-556, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:36:y:2017:i:5:p:548-556
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1268647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1268647
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1268647?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:36:y:2017:i:5:p:548-556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.