IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v32y2013i2p132-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological costs of support seeking and choice of communication channel

Author

Listed:
  • Vivien Lim
  • Thompson Teo
  • Xiuxi Zhao

Abstract

While seeking support brings benefits, it also entails some costs to the seeker. We propose that seeking support involves two types of psychological costs: intra- and inter-personal costs. Intra-personal cost is defined as the psychological threat arising from the perception that one fails to achieve one's own aspiration, while inter-personal cost is defined as the psychological threat arising from the perception that one fails to meet others' expectation. These costs result from individuals focusing on different aspects of the self and will deter individuals from seeking support. We conducted two studies. In the first study, we adapted, developed and validated scales to measure the two types of psychological costs. In the second study, we examined the impact of both types of psychological costs on individuals' choice of communication channel when seeking support. We found that only inter-personal cost was significantly related to seekers' choice of communication channel. Specifically, the higher the inter-personal cost perceived, the greater the likelihood that individuals would prefer email over face-to-face communication. We also found that women were more likely to seek support through email than face-to-face communication compared to men. Implications of the results for research and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivien Lim & Thompson Teo & Xiuxi Zhao, 2013. "Psychological costs of support seeking and choice of communication channel," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 132-146.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:32:y:2013:i:2:p:132-146
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.518248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2010.518248
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2010.518248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:32:y:2013:i:2:p:132-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.