IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v42y2022i13-14p1030-1053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technostressors and service employees outcomes: a longitudinal study

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Raza
  • Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq
  • Haleema Zia
  • Zia ur-Rehman
  • Rehan Ahmad

Abstract

This study determines the impact of technostress creators on employee wellbeing dimensions and employee engagement. This study also examines the moderating role of mindfulness and optimism to use technology between technostress creator and employee wellbeing. A longitudinal research design was adopted to collect the data from 286 government employees involved in public dealing during two waves of COVID-19 in Pakistan. The data were assessed using structural equation modeling and Hayes’ method to test mediation and moderation. The study findings shed important light on the role of personal resources in reducing stress over a time period. The results conclude that technostress creators negatively influence employee wellbeing dimensions and employee engagement in both waves. Also, personal resources, i.e. mindfulness and optimism to use technology, dampen the negative association of technostress creators on employee wellbeing. One of the significant limitations of this research is collecting the data from employees working in public offices only, whereas this study fills an essential gap by exploring the role of technostressors using a longitudinal study design.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Raza & Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq & Haleema Zia & Zia ur-Rehman & Rehan Ahmad, 2022. "Technostressors and service employees outcomes: a longitudinal study," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(13-14), pages 1030-1053, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:42:y:2022:i:13-14:p:1030-1053
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2022.2081685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2022.2081685
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2022.2081685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:42:y:2022:i:13-14:p:1030-1053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.