IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v42y2022i11-12p843-871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the role of frontline employee felt obligation in services

Author

Listed:
  • Neeru Malhotra
  • Nicholas Ashill
  • Cristiana R. Lages
  • Amir Homayounfard

Abstract

Drawing on social exchange theory, this study investigates the mechanism of felt obligation underpinning the link between three key forms of perceived support (organization, supervisor, and team) and three key frontline employee work outcomes. The study also examines felt obligation - employee work outcomes relationships under the boundary condition of perceived fairness in reward allocation to explore if felt obligation preserves employee support despite unfair outcomes. Data obtained from 347 frontline employees in a call center organization largely support our hypotheses. Our findings demonstrate that perceived supervisor and team support exert a greater influence on felt obligation than the commonly investigated perceived organizational support. Our findings underscore the importance of felt obligation as an influential social exchange force that stimulates affective commitment and reduces turnover intentions of employees even under conditions when fairness in reward allocation is perceived to be lower. Felt obligation also influences service recovery performance positively.

Suggested Citation

  • Neeru Malhotra & Nicholas Ashill & Cristiana R. Lages & Amir Homayounfard, 2022. "Understanding the role of frontline employee felt obligation in services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(11-12), pages 843-871, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:42:y:2022:i:11-12:p:843-871
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2020.1858062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2020.1858062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2020.1858062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:42:y:2022:i:11-12:p:843-871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.