IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v41y2021i5-6p382-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective coping strategies for stressed frontline employees in service occupations: outcomes and drivers

Author

Listed:
  • Veronika L. Selzer
  • Jan H. Schumann
  • Marion Büttgen
  • Zelal Ates
  • Marcin Komor
  • Julian Volz

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the negative outcomes of role ambiguity in boundary-spanning positions, insight into how to prevent frontline employees from experiencing role ambiguity is sparse. This study addresses questions as to how the problem-focused coping strategies used by frontline employees can effectively reduce perceived role ambiguity. The gathered evidence indicates that only action coping is effective, whereas instrumental support seeking in fact enhances perceived role ambiguity. An examination of intrinsic and extrinsic coping resources as drivers of coping has revealed that conscientiousness and supervisor support are helpful coping resources. Contrastively, neuroticism drives insufficient coping and inhibits the effective use of coping resources. We find that managers of service firms should provide training to ensure effective supervisor support; also, in recruitment procedures they should consider potential employees’ personality traits, to reduce and prevent role ambiguity experienced by frontline employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronika L. Selzer & Jan H. Schumann & Marion Büttgen & Zelal Ates & Marcin Komor & Julian Volz, 2021. "Effective coping strategies for stressed frontline employees in service occupations: outcomes and drivers," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5-6), pages 382-399, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:41:y:2021:i:5-6:p:382-399
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2018.1548613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2018.1548613
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2018.1548613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:41:y:2021:i:5-6:p:382-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.