IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v37y2017i1p33-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cattle, Land, People, and Accountability Systems: The Makings of a Values-based Organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse Dillard
  • Madeleine Pullman

Abstract

An in-depth case study of a natural beef cooperative describes a management information and accountability system (MIAS) that emerged from, and facilitates the nurturing of, a values-based organisation’s core values. Sustaining the family ranching culture and community represents the core value upon which the values-based agricultural coop is founded. Responsible people, land and animal management are central elements in sustainable ranching operations. The MIAS is designed to support the social and environmental objectives as well as to maintain the economic viability of the ranchers that make up this social enterprise. The MIAS is the key to linking organisational core values, both intrinsic and extrinsic, through its products, to its customers. Unique product attributes are acquired through the application of appropriate production process, maintained throughout the supply chain, and their presence certified to the end customer. The MIAS is designed to motivate and reward achieving these values-based characteristics and processes. The case study provides a unique example of a MIAS that is grounded in, and constructed to specifically address, the core values-based objective and, in doing so, to facilitate economic sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse Dillard & Madeleine Pullman, 2017. "Cattle, Land, People, and Accountability Systems: The Makings of a Values-based Organisation," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 33-58, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:37:y:2017:i:1:p:33-58
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2017.1284600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1284600
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1284600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:37:y:2017:i:1:p:33-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.