IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rurpxx/v15y2022i2p275-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived benefits and risks of developing mixed communities in New Zealand: implementer perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Elinor Chisholm
  • Nevil Pierse
  • Philippa Howden-Chapman

Abstract

In New Zealand, mixed communities are developed on green fields or to replace existing public housing as a way of increasing housing supply, and, in some views, improving outcomes for low-income residents. This paper identifies the effects of developing mixed communities as perceived by implementers of these projects – politicians, officials, developers, and housing providers – and places these in the context of the international evidence. The range of perspectives on potential benefits and risks of mixed-income development for public tenants, the mixed evidence base, and uncertainty about the applicability of research evidence across different urban contexts should inform a research agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Elinor Chisholm & Nevil Pierse & Philippa Howden-Chapman, 2022. "Perceived benefits and risks of developing mixed communities in New Zealand: implementer perspectives," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 275-298, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rurpxx:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:275-298
    DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2020.1801831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17535069.2020.1801831
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17535069.2020.1801831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rurpxx:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:275-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rurp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.