IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsrsxx/v8y2021i1p273-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The politics of urban regeneration in Liverpool and Everton FC’s alternate new stadium-project plans

Author

Listed:
  • Elias Georgantas
  • Nikos Lekakis

Abstract

Urban politics is a US-dominated field, and since the late 1990s there have been academic discussions with a view, on the one hand, to better understanding the British/European case and what distinguishes it from the US one and, on the other, to develop a better comparative theory much of which subsequently went down the path of studying neoliberalism. This article follows an urban politics perspective and the qualitative case-study method to explore Everton Football Club’s 20-year-long unsuccessful struggle to relocate to a new modern stadium of its own in the Liverpool city-region. Although this paper has limitations stemming from the fact that it is a single case study, its contribution to the field is three-fold. First, it adds to the scant literature on new private sports stadia in the UK. Second, it shows that US-based urban politics theories beyond regimes may remain alive in the UK. Third, it supplements the neoliberalist–financialized city statecraft literature by adding sports stadia as infrastructural projects never before incorporated.

Suggested Citation

  • Elias Georgantas & Nikos Lekakis, 2021. "The politics of urban regeneration in Liverpool and Everton FC’s alternate new stadium-project plans," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 273-290, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsrsxx:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:273-290
    DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2021.1918573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21681376.2021.1918573
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21681376.2021.1918573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsrsxx:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:273-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsrs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.