IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsrsxx/v7y2020i1p267-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Well-being and unemployment during the Great Recession: an empirical analysis across UK local authority districts

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Mulligan
  • Marta Zieba

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between unemployment and psychological well-being before and during the Great Recession across 249 UK local authority districts (LADs). Substantial evidence demonstrates that unemployment has a large negative effect on psychological well-being. However, unique social norms develop in geographical areas with high unemployment rates, which significantly reduce the negative impact of unemployment on well-being. Though the post-2007 Great Recession period was characterized by widespread unemployment, few studies have examined the impact of this crisis on well-being in high- and low-unemployment local areas. The analysis constructs a rich panel data set which follows 15,798 individuals from 1998 to 2014, and applies difference-in-differences fixed-effects and general method of moments estimators. The findings indicate that unemployment had a large negative impact on psychological well-being. However, the magnitude of this effect did not change (or was even slightly lower) during the Great Recession. Furthermore, the unemployment social norm also ceased to have any additional effect on well-being during the Great Recession in high-unemployment LADs, as opposed to the pre-recession period.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Mulligan & Marta Zieba, 2020. "Well-being and unemployment during the Great Recession: an empirical analysis across UK local authority districts," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 267-287, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsrsxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:267-287
    DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2020.1784779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21681376.2020.1784779
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21681376.2020.1784779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsrsxx:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:267-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsrs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.