IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v16y2021i2p170-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulating artificial intelligence and robotics: ethics by design in a digital society

Author

Listed:
  • Ron Iphofen
  • Mihalis Kritikos

Abstract

Evidence-based policymaking must urgently consider regulations addressing advances made in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics, as well as issues of ownership, management and control. Many repetitive manufacturing tasks once requiring human labour have already been replaced by robots. The general public are facing associated risks to safety and privacy with the appearance of drones, driverless cars, robots of care, and human repair and enhancement. Major challenges for policymakers arise as machines acquire the ability to learn and become autonomous in their decision making. When independent of the humans that created them, their true ‘intelligence’ is tested in terms of their status as ‘moral beings’. Given their algorithmic decision making, questions arise about how ‘they’ could make ethical decisions about their actions and interactions with humans. This paper reviews current issues raised about the morality of autonomous learning machines and explores whether policy can be developed to address their potential to acquire a moral status. The authors argue that policies and regulations will fail if no account is taken of the ethics of robotics, either to ensure an ‘ethics by design’ or prevent them from becoming ‘autonomous moral agents’.

Suggested Citation

  • Ron Iphofen & Mihalis Kritikos, 2021. "Regulating artificial intelligence and robotics: ethics by design in a digital society," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 170-184, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:170-184
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2018.1563803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2018.1563803
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2018.1563803?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:170-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.