IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v15y2020i2p175-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ESRC university project on ‘dissident’ Irish republicanism: some reflections on the relationship between research, academia, and the security state

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Hayes

Abstract

This article focuses on a particular research project, funded by the ESRC, which aimed to examine the so-called dissident Republicanism in Ireland. By analysing the flaws in the proposal for the ESRC project, this article attempts to tease out and highlight some of the critical issues faced by those engaged in sustained research activity in the social sciences. The subsequent analysis throws into a much sharper focus the nature of the relationship between academia and the state. The article deploys original ESRC and Government documentation and evaluates pertinent secondary source material to conclude that particular types of state intervention into the research process, such as Research Excellence Framework and the ‘impact agenda’, have had (and will continue to have) a deleterious effect on genuinely autonomous academic output. Indeed, in certain key areas, the emergence of a ‘security state’ agenda has not only fostered a sterile functionalism in academia which militates against the construction of independent and critical narratives but also threatens to diminish our understanding of complex social phenomena, such as the use of violence for political purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Hayes, 2020. "The ESRC university project on ‘dissident’ Irish republicanism: some reflections on the relationship between research, academia, and the security state," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 175-195, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:175-195
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2018.1427884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2018.1427884
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2018.1427884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:175-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.