IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v14y2019i3-4p394-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tapping and assessing the concept of educational regret: methodological techniques for opening up biographical reflection

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela Aronson
  • Matthew Fleming

Abstract

Regret, a negative assessment of an action committed or a path not taken, is a common biographical experience. However, it is a difficult concept to study in social science research. Participants are likely to enact protective barriers to avoid confronting personal responsibility for ‘bad’ decisions. Drawing on examples from an in-depth interview study of postsecondary educational experiences, we examine a technique and set of questions that can move beyond these biographical research roadblocks. We argue that a highly structured and comprehensive, yet flexible interview guide is ideal for exploring this concept. This article also outlines two questions that can elicit biographical regret, particularly educational regret. The first question asks respondents what they would change about their college experience. The second question asks respondents what advice they would provide to new college students. Together, these methodological techniques are effective at overcoming potential research roadblocks because they allow for an agentic, positive reframing of the experience of regret.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela Aronson & Matthew Fleming, 2019. "Tapping and assessing the concept of educational regret: methodological techniques for opening up biographical reflection," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3-4), pages 394-406, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:14:y:2019:i:3-4:p:394-406
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2018.1448938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2018.1448938
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2018.1448938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:14:y:2019:i:3-4:p:394-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.