IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v13y2018i3-4p337-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Don’t say “research”’: reducing bidirectional risk in Kibera slum

Author

Listed:
  • E. Ashley Wilson

Abstract

Kenya’s 2007 presidential elections led to what was widely termed ‘ethnic violence’, resulting in over 1000 deaths and 600,000 displacements. Kibera slum, in the country’s capital, is home to the opposition leader’s stronghold and was at the conflict’s epicentre. Conducting fieldwork in Kibera a decade later and months before the 2017 presidential election presented a multitude of methodological risks to both the research team and the Kibera community. This article explores what I call ‘bidirectional risks’ – risks to both research team and research participants – that were encountered and how these risks were minimised using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies including a household survey, engaged ethnography and community research collaboration. These strategies increased the safety of both the research team and participants, allowed the research team to collect sensitive data and suggested possibilities for further democratising the anthropological research process.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Ashley Wilson, 2018. "‘Don’t say “research”’: reducing bidirectional risk in Kibera slum," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3-4), pages 337-353, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:13:y:2018:i:3-4:p:337-353
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2017.1418525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2017.1418525
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2017.1418525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:13:y:2018:i:3-4:p:337-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.