IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocec/v81y2023i2p304-333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing a virtuous political economy: an adaptation of Unto This Last emphasizing individual conscience and self determination

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsten Madden
  • Nicholas Armstrong

Abstract

Flourishing life being the objective, John Ruskin’s Unto This Last (1866) posits that the implementation of virtue in political economy also reduces inequality and power-over structures of single individuals over multitudes, generates superior product quality and nurtures the ecological system. This essay re-introduces the primary directive of Unto This Last: to design an economics based in virtue. Adopting the virtues of higher order justice, affection, integrity, and ‘sense and firmness,’ this essay replaces Ruskin’s penchant for authoritarian paternalism with responsiveness to individual conscience and respect for self determination. Practical insight into a virtuous political economy includes explicit descriptions of virtuous economic behavior. This virtuous political economy makes explicit assumptions, adopts key definitions, expands on institutions, and reiterates implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsten Madden & Nicholas Armstrong, 2023. "Designing a virtuous political economy: an adaptation of Unto This Last emphasizing individual conscience and self determination," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(2), pages 304-333, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:81:y:2023:i:2:p:304-333
    DOI: 10.1080/00346764.2021.1878260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00346764.2021.1878260
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00346764.2021.1878260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:81:y:2023:i:2:p:304-333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.