IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocec/v79y2021i2p191-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market competition and ethical standards: the case of fair trade mainstreaming

Author

Listed:
  • Eefje de Gelder
  • Albert de Vaal
  • Paul H. Driessen
  • Esther-Mirjam Sent
  • Josée Bloemer

Abstract

This paper analyzes whether ideology-driven firms doing business based on ethical principles such as those envisioned by fair trade can survive in the market when competition increases. By formally evaluating the development of fair trade over time, we show that such firms cannot continue to exist with full compliance with ethical standards about fairness. We conceptualize fairness as wealth transfers to small local producers in developing countries and apply a Hotelling-model of horizontal competition in fairness. Results show that increasing the scale and scope of fair trade products in the market implies that concessions on fairness are needed to survive intensified competition. Ideology-driven fair trade firms will survive only if they differentiate. In the end, paradoxically, wealth transfers by ideology-driven firms can be upheld only by focusing on other attributes than fairness to attract consumers. Only then can ideology-driven firms maintain ethical standards in a market environment, while alleviating pressure on total wealth transfers to local producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Eefje de Gelder & Albert de Vaal & Paul H. Driessen & Esther-Mirjam Sent & Josée Bloemer, 2021. "Market competition and ethical standards: the case of fair trade mainstreaming," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(2), pages 191-221, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:79:y:2021:i:2:p:191-221
    DOI: 10.1080/00346764.2019.1650292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00346764.2019.1650292
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00346764.2019.1650292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:79:y:2021:i:2:p:191-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.