IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v26y2023i1p72-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constraints to leveraging regular season sport team events

Author

Listed:
  • Vitor Sobral
  • Sheranne Fairley
  • Danny O’Brien

Abstract

Research on event leveraging has revealed that certain constraints inhibit the realisation of desired benefits from event hosting. Using qualitative action research methods, this study examined the constraints to leveraging regular season professional sport team events for tourism. The leveraging potential of regular season professional sport team events has been largely ignored – both by researchers and practitioners. This presented an ideal opportunity to examine the pre-leveraging phase with a view to understanding leveraging constraints. The results identified five overarching constraints: lack of collaboration; priorities and resources; perceived benefit radius; perceived tourism potential; and, unclaimed responsibility. We propose a process model to better understand how leveraging constraints emerge and can be negotiated over time. This research is among the first to demonstrate the utility of team events for inclusion in regional event portfolios. It, therefore, builds on extant knowledge by presenting a more holistic conceptualisation of the inherent constraints to event leveraging, and further, provides a basis from which to successfully negotiate these constraints.Constraints prevent regular season sport team events from being considered leverageable.Collaboration, priorities, and resources are constraints to leveraging sport team events.Perceived tourism potential and the perceived benefit radius were constraints to leverage.Discussing regular season events in relation to tourism leads to a shift in attitudes in opinions.Identifying responsibility for leverage remains a constraint.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitor Sobral & Sheranne Fairley & Danny O’Brien, 2023. "Constraints to leveraging regular season sport team events," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 72-92, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:26:y:2023:i:1:p:72-92
    DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2021.1989238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14413523.2021.1989238
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14413523.2021.1989238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:26:y:2023:i:1:p:72-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.