IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v24y2021i2p250-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying intergroup contact theory to sport-for-development

Author

Listed:
  • Nico Schulenkorf
  • Emma Sherry

Abstract

Despite evidence of its effectiveness in the area of conflict studies, intergroup contact theory (ICT) has rarely been applied to specifically designed sport-for-development (SFD) interventions. As such, the purpose of this study is to demonstrate the suitability and applicability of ICT as a framework analyzing SFD interventions that aim to foster integrative social transformation. In this paper, we first situate ICT within the broader sport and SFD contexts before demonstrating the utility of ICT through a reflective analysis of League Bilong Laif (LBL), an education-focused SFD intervention in Papua New Guinea. Our examination of LBL demonstrates that ICT may well be a useful framework to design and deliver SFD interventions, particularly in the context of existing intergroup tensions. To maximize opportunities for positive social impact, we propose the aspect of ‘cultural relevance and excitement potential’ as an additional critical condition for achieving meaningful intergroup development.Application of Intergroup Contact Theory (ICT) to Sport-for-Development (SFD).Reflective analysis based on empirical research in Papua New Guinea.ICT identified as a suitable framework for SFD design, delivery and evaluation.‘Cultural relevance and excitement potential’ as critical condition for positive contact.

Suggested Citation

  • Nico Schulenkorf & Emma Sherry, 2021. "Applying intergroup contact theory to sport-for-development," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 250-270, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:250-270
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2020.08.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2020.08.004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2020.08.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:250-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.