IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v40y2016i3p39-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Inequalities in Morbidity: A South African Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • M. Ntuli
  • M. Chitiga-Mabugu
  • S. Karuaihe
  • F. Alaba
  • E. Tsoanamatsie
  • P. Kwenda

Abstract

International studies of gender differences in health status largely attest that women have worse health conditions than men, which compromise women's contribution to economic development. Using the South African Demographic and Health Survey of 2003, we investigate whether this disparity also holds in developing countries such as South Africa. Our results concur with previous findings that South African women are more likely to suffer from poor health than men. They also reveal that the health gap is largely driven by a relatively higher prevalence of health conditions among women, rather than by the severity of the conditions that they face. Furthermore, contrary to the common view that the health gap closes with age, we find that the gap exhibits little variation across age groups and it persists in old age. This suggests a need for preventive measures to reduce the occurrence of health conditions in South Africa - which is vital for economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Ntuli & M. Chitiga-Mabugu & S. Karuaihe & F. Alaba & E. Tsoanamatsie & P. Kwenda, 2016. "Gender Inequalities in Morbidity: A South African Investigation," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 39-64, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:40:y:2016:i:3:p:39-64
    DOI: 10.1080/10800379.2016.12097303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10800379.2016.12097303
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10800379.2016.12097303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:40:y:2016:i:3:p:39-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.