IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v38y2024i1p65-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the tax compliance costs of individual taxpayers in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Stark
  • Sharon Smulders
  • Elza Odendaal

Abstract

The aim of the study was to quantify the total tax compliance costs (TCC) of individual taxpayers in South Africa for the 2017 and 2018 years of assessment as no studies were found that comprehensively quantified these costs in South Africa. A quantitative research design was followed using an online questionnaire to collect the data. Different sampling and data collection methods were used: for 2017 snowball sampling was employed providing 752 useable responses, whereas for 2018, a random sample was made possible with the assistance of the South African Revenue Service (SARS) resulting in 10 260 useable responses. The TCC for each year was calculated in three steps. First, the number of hours spent by the respondents on each tax-related activity was ascertained. Second, this time was then multiplied by an hourly rate using various methods and lastly the time value was added to the respondents’ out-of-pocket costs (arising from payments to tax practitioners for assistance and from sundry expenditure). The average total TCC for 2017 was estimated at between R4 604 and R12 661 while for 2018 it was between R2 544 and R3 742. The TCC calculations provide a baseline that will assist in measuring the impact of subsequent reforms, such as the 2021 auto-assessments introduced by SARS, on TCC.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Stark & Sharon Smulders & Elza Odendaal, 2024. "Quantifying the tax compliance costs of individual taxpayers in South Africa," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 65-89, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:38:y:2024:i:1:p:65-89
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2023.2197319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2023.2197319
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2023.2197319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:38:y:2024:i:1:p:65-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.