IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v37y2023i1p62-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Philna Coetzee
  • Lourens Erasmus
  • Mangakane Pududu
  • Shan Malan
  • Audrey Legodi

Abstract

Audit committees are often implicated as accomplices in governance failures, or slow to react to findings. The power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness in developing countries is an under-researched area. With the progress of developing countries threatened by malfeasance, research on public sector audit committee organisational power, contributes to the conversation on power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness in developing countries. The paper identified power drivers, through exploratory induction, that should support South African public sector audit committee effectiveness. Focus group discussions were analysed applying Interactive Qualitative Analysis methodology. The drivers are linked to Kalbers and Fogarty’s study on the power typology of organisational power theory, which posits power as an antecedent to effectiveness. The study concludes that three central themes provide power to the South African public sector audit committees, namely political climate; individual and collective audit committee competence; and the independence of the audit committee. The paper also modestly extends the organisational power theory in respect of the elements of power.

Suggested Citation

  • Philna Coetzee & Lourens Erasmus & Mangakane Pududu & Shan Malan & Audrey Legodi, 2023. "The power drivers of public sector audit committee effectiveness," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 62-84, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:37:y:2023:i:1:p:62-84
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2022.2128556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2022.2128556
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2022.2128556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:37:y:2023:i:1:p:62-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.