IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v34y2020i1p45-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goodwill impairment testing disclosures – South African compliance in 2018

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Day

Abstract

This paper reviews compliance with the IAS 36 goodwill impairment testing disclosure requirements by South African entities included in the All Share Index of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. A detailed extraction of disclosures provided by entities with material levels of goodwill was compared to the key requirements. The approach taken is grounded in an assumption that the diligence with which preparers attend to visible disclosures acts a “litmus test” of the reliability of the invisible workings of the “black box” of impairment testing. The results are analysed through a critical narrative proposing insights relevant to preparers, auditors, regulators, and standard-setters. Consistent with results of studies in other jurisdictions the disclosures of South African entities are often incomplete and inconsistent, presented in a minimalist, generic, “boiler-plate” fashion considered to be of limited use to decision-makers assessing the reliability of impairment testing. This is the first known detailed review of South African levels of compliance with goodwill impairment testing disclosure requirements offered as an initial contribution to assessing the reliability of goodwill balances reported by South African corporate entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Day, 2020. "Goodwill impairment testing disclosures – South African compliance in 2018," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 45-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:34:y:2020:i:1:p:45-62
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2019.1668120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2019.1668120
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2019.1668120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:34:y:2020:i:1:p:45-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.