IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v33y2019i3p163-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional logics and sustainability of selected small and medium-sized audit firms

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Coetzee
  • Karin Barac
  • Joanne Seligmann

Abstract

Although an abundance of research exists concerning larger audit firms, studies on small-scale audit firms are scarce. This study investigates how small and medium-sized audit firms deal with professional and commercial logic for sense-making and legitimisation of their strategies and practices to remain sustainable, particularly as audit practices, in a changing environment. The study focuses on a specific change event, namely a change in legislation that resulted in mandatory audit relief for certain small and medium-sized enterprises. Following a multiple-case study design, a qualitative research approach was used to show that small and medium-sized audit firms responded to a threat to their sustainability in an environment transformed by new legislation, by broadening the service offerings which coincided with selective adoption of practices related to commercial logic. Those retaining a more focused professional orientation had a positive outlook on the sustainability of their audit practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Coetzee & Karin Barac & Joanne Seligmann, 2019. "Institutional logics and sustainability of selected small and medium-sized audit firms," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 163-186, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:33:y:2019:i:3:p:163-186
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2019.1655189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2019.1655189
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2019.1655189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:33:y:2019:i:3:p:163-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.