IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v32y2018i1p88-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A liabilities approach to the likelihood of liquidation in business rescue

Author

Listed:
  • Wesley Rosslyn-Smith
  • Marius Pretorius

Abstract

While reorganisation procedures aim to salvage financially distressed firms, they are often abused, as uneconomic, failing firms commence with proceedings that erode value rather than preserve it. The commencement standard for business rescue is aimed at preventing such abuse, though it is often hampered by vagueness and limited practical application. Drawing on turnaround literature and the requirements of a commencement standard, this study attempts to address these drawbacks by assessing the prospect of reorganisation on commencement. The study identifies from the turnaround literature nine liabilities that could prove fatal. Under the widely-held principle of value maximisation, the researchers then propose a ‘likelihood of liquidation’ framework to evaluate, before the commencement of proceedings, the reasonable prospect of the firm’s recovering. The analysis in this paper sets the agenda for future research and provides an opportunity to explore the practical application of the framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Wesley Rosslyn-Smith & Marius Pretorius, 2018. "A liabilities approach to the likelihood of liquidation in business rescue," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 88-107, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:88-107
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2017.1414350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2017.1414350
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2017.1414350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:88-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.