IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v32y2018i1p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair value accounting by listed South African companies in the non-financial sector

Author

Listed:
  • M. H.Y. Razak
  • L. J. Stainbank

Abstract

This study uses a content analysis of 82 listed South African companies’ annual reports to determine the extent to which South African listed companies in the non-financial sector choose optional fair value accounting (FVA). The study found that almost all companies disclosed historical cost as their primary measurement basis, disclosed FVA for financial instruments as the exception to the historical cost basis, and generally did not choose the fair value option in areas where International Financial Reporting Standards offer a free choice of whether or not to apply FVA. More specifically, most companies did not choose optional FVA for property, plant and equipment and did not choose optional FVA for intangible assets. Seventy-eight percent (78%) of the non-property investment companies did not choose optional FVA for investment properties in contrast to the property-investment companies where nearly all adopted optional FVA to account for their investment properties. Ninety-six percent (96%) of companies did not account for investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures at fair value in their separate financial statements. The study therefore concludes that companies generally do not adopt optional FVA where there is a choice of whether to do so or not.

Suggested Citation

  • M. H.Y. Razak & L. J. Stainbank, 2018. "Fair value accounting by listed South African companies in the non-financial sector," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:1-24
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2017.1342348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2017.1342348
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2017.1342348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.