IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v31y2017i3p181-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Section 12M contributions in terms of the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962: Normal tax implications for the retired employee

Author

Listed:
  • E van Wyk
  • M Terblanche

Abstract

Section 12M of the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 allows a normal tax deduction for employers who pay the post-retirement medical contributions by way of lump sum payments on behalf of retired employees. Although a full deduction is granted to the employer for a contribution in terms of section 12M, an area of uncertainty has been identified by the authors of this paper. This area of uncertainty involves the income tax implications for the retired employee upon receipt of such contribution or upon receipt of a benefit regarding such contribution from the former employer. Possible tax implications were considered in terms of paragraphs (a), (c), (d), (f) and (i) of the gross income definition, as well as in terms of paragraphs 2(i) read with 12A of the Seventh Schedule to the Act. A number of binding class rulings and one binding private ruling published by SARS were investigated, supported by a scrutiny of the relevant provisions of the Act. It is concluded that a contribution in terms of section12M(2)(b) will be regarded as a fringe benefit in terms of paragraph 2(i) read with paragraph 12A of the Seventh Schedule to the Act, whilst a section 12M(2)(a) contribution might be a paragraph (c) paragraph (d) or paragraph (f) inclusion in gross income. The latter two might qualify as severance benefits. Lastly, the employee will be entitled to a section 6A(2)(a) medical scheme fees tax credit should the amount be applied for medical contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • E van Wyk & M Terblanche, 2017. "Section 12M contributions in terms of the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962: Normal tax implications for the retired employee," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 181-192, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:31:y:2017:i:3:p:181-192
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2016.1192328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2016.1192328
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2016.1192328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:31:y:2017:i:3:p:181-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.