IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v29y2015i2p132-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring student perceptions and experiences of ICT-enhanced formative assessment in an undergraduate management accounting course

Author

Listed:
  • K. J. Barnard
  • M. Mostert

Abstract

The central role of assessment in driving student learning has been well argued in the literature. In particular, continuous formative assessment with timely feedback helps motivate students to work consistently, while the addition of just-in-time support may further motivate and support learning. Information and communication technologies have the potential both to contain the administrative burden of frequent formative assessment and enhance the provision of timely feedback. Drawing on theories of assessment and motivation this study investigates the value of combining two technological interventions, tutorial screencasts and online quizzes, for enhancing student learning in an undergraduate management accounting course. Data was collected from the usage logs of the learning management system and a survey of student experiences. The results indicate that the interventions enhanced students’ learning experiences both by motivating them to engage with the coursework and by encouraging them to do so on a continuous basis.

Suggested Citation

  • K. J. Barnard & M. Mostert, 2015. "Exploring student perceptions and experiences of ICT-enhanced formative assessment in an undergraduate management accounting course," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 132-150, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:29:y:2015:i:2:p:132-150
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2015.1006483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2015.1006483
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2015.1006483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:29:y:2015:i:2:p:132-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.