IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v29y2015i1p71-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IFRS 3 “grey area” regarding contingent liabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Eloise de Jager

Abstract

All South African listed companies must prepare their financial statements using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Although IFRS aims to provide a framework that can be applied to ensure comparable financial information, there are “grey areas” where judgement needs to be applied. One such area, relating to the classification of contingent liabilities (specifically pending lawsuits) in a business combination, is explored during this research. A survey was distributed to the Top 40 Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) companies presenting different scenarios regarding lawsuits. The company's views on whether the specific scenario presented a possible obligation (which would not be recognised in a business combination) or a present obligation (which would be recognised) was gathered. Some statistically significant differences in opinion were noted between the companies, which could have significant implications on goodwill calculations in a business combination. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) have proposed changes to IAS 37 that could reduce this uncertainty and differences in interpretation, but until such time the treatment of pending lawsuits in a business combination continues to remain a grey area in IFRS.

Suggested Citation

  • Eloise de Jager, 2015. "IFRS 3 “grey area” regarding contingent liabilities," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 71-83, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:29:y:2015:i:1:p:71-83
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2015.999473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2015.999473
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2015.999473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:29:y:2015:i:1:p:71-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.