IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v26y2012i1p17-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between devoted study time and auditing learning approaches followed by prospective chartered accountants in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • K Barac

Abstract

Learning approaches in accounting, distinguishing between deep, surface and strategic approaches, have been researched in several countries other than South Africa. The study reported in this article provided a South African perspective by investigating the auditing learning approaches of prospective chartered accountants in relation to time they spent studying during their final university postgraduate programme and their preparation for auditing topics examined in the first part of their professional accounting qualifying examination. The widely accepted research instrument, the Approaches and Studies Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST), was applied. Statistical analysis revealed a preference for the strategic approach by candidates who passed the auditing question in the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants’ 2010 Qualifying Examination Part 1. The study found that those who devoted more time were more inclined to follow a strategic or deep approach, while less devoted study time resulted in a surface approach. Various areas for future research were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • K Barac, 2012. "The relationship between devoted study time and auditing learning approaches followed by prospective chartered accountants in South Africa," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 17-42, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:26:y:2012:i:1:p:17-42
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2012.11435162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2012.11435162
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2012.11435162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:26:y:2012:i:1:p:17-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.