IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v25y2011i1p35-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effect of open-book examinations on the learning behavior of accountancy students

Author

Listed:
  • S J Kruger

Abstract

In 2003 the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA) changed its assessment policy from a closed-book to an open-book format. One reason for this was to encourage better learning behaviour amongst students. This paper investigates whether students perceive this aim to have been achieved, by means of a survey conducted among final-year accounting students who were preparing for the qualifying examination of SAICA. Assessment in the first three years of study was generally done by means of closed-book examinations, but in their final year, students were assessed by means of open-book tests and examinations (OBA). A comparison was made between the views of these potential chartered accountants and those of lecturers in accounting departments at selected universities.Students were generally positive about the introduction of OBA, but lecturers were less enthusiastic. Their conclusion was that OBA has generally been a step in the right direction to preparing students better for the workplace. Cognisance should, however, be taken of the negative study behaviour that was encountered. The paper also proposes strategies to improve the effectiveness of OBA.

Suggested Citation

  • S J Kruger, 2011. "Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effect of open-book examinations on the learning behavior of accountancy students," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 35-57, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:25:y:2011:i:1:p:35-57
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2011.11435152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2011.11435152
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2011.11435152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:25:y:2011:i:1:p:35-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.