IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v24y2010i1p49-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploratory analysis of stakeholders’ expectations and perceptions of corporate social and environmental reporting in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • C G Mitchell
  • T R Hill

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study that surveyed South African stakeholders of corporate social and environmental reporting to assess their perceptions of what businesses should be reporting, and how effectively they perceive it is being reported. Evidence was gathered from questionnaires completed by respondents of samples from key stakeholder groups, and from interviews of representatives of other stakeholders groups.The study found that areas traditionally associated with CSR reporting such as impacts on the environment, employees, consumers and the broader public, were considered to be inadequately reported. The study also found that many areas of traditional financial and corporate governance were also perceived to be less than adequately reported. The paper concluded that this represents evidence for a need for improved corporate reporting. Stakeholders believed that there is insufficient pressure on companies to present CSR disclosure.The study also showed that stakeholders believed that CSR should be included with the annual report, should be prepared to the same standards as financial reported, and should be externally verified or audited.

Suggested Citation

  • C G Mitchell & T R Hill, 2010. "An exploratory analysis of stakeholders’ expectations and perceptions of corporate social and environmental reporting in South Africa," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 49-78, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:24:y:2010:i:1:p:49-78
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2010.11435147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2010.11435147
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2010.11435147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:24:y:2010:i:1:p:49-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.