IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v21y2007i1p81-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio strategies for hedging against rand weakness

Author

Listed:
  • G D I Barr
  • C G Holdsworth
  • B S Kantor

Abstract

This paper considers how portfolios may be structured which provide protection against Rand exchange rate movement and, in particular, against Rand weakness. Two portfolio optimisation methods are used to estimate the portfolio weights of the Top 40 shares listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) which provide the maximum protection against some pre-defined expectation of Rand weakness. The performance of these Rand-hedge portfolios is then compared to that of the Itrix FTSE 100 Exchange Traded fund (ETF) which mimics the London-based FTSE 100. While the portfolios based on the JSE Top 40 components provide slightly less Rand hedge protection than the Itrix FTSE 100 ETF, they are still able to provide a very effective exchange rate hedge. Moreover, they are also able to provide greater exposure to the South African market and this has resulted in a significant performance advantage over the Itrix FTSE 100 over the last five years.

Suggested Citation

  • G D I Barr & C G Holdsworth & B S Kantor, 2007. "Portfolio strategies for hedging against rand weakness," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 81-101, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:21:y:2007:i:1:p:81-101
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2007.11435127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2007.11435127
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2007.11435127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:21:y:2007:i:1:p:81-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.