IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v16y2002i1p19-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employers’ and public accountants’ attitudes towards employee reporting in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • L. Stainbank

Abstract

Employee reporting has evolved as a form of reporting to meet the needs of the employees for information about the enterprise for which they work. This is a particularly pertinent topic in South Africa as a result of recent pronouncements which highlight the need to provide users other than shareholders with information and which emphasize the rights of employees.In South Africa, companies are producing employee reports although there is no guidance by any regulatory bodies as to the form and content of such reports. This paper reports the results of a study, which forms part of a wider investigation of the topic, focusing on the attitudes of South African employers and public accountants towards the desirability of employee reporting, its form and contents, and public accountant involvement with published employee reports.After analysis it was concluded that: (a)There is a need for employee reporting.(b)Although the average response provided support for a separate employee report issued annually as the most desirable form of employee reporting, employers preferred regular meetings as their most desired form of employee reporting.(c)Employers and public accountants are of the opinion that public accountant involvement with published employee reports is undesirable.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Stainbank, 2002. "Employers’ and public accountants’ attitudes towards employee reporting in South Africa," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 19-40, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:16:y:2002:i:1:p:19-40
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2002.11435100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2002.11435100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2002.11435100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:16:y:2002:i:1:p:19-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.