IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v16y2002i1p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational commitment of accountants in Australia and South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • B M Clayton
  • M R Hutchinson

Abstract

This paper examines the independent variables of perceived environmental uncertainty (PEU) and the cultural beliefs of collectivism/individualism between two countries, Australia and South Africa. These countries were chosen because Australia is a stable democracy and South Africa an emerging democracy which is undergoing significant political, social and economic transformation. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether accountants’ commitment to an organization is associated with perceived environmental uncertainty, collectivism and nationality.The results of this study suggest that individuals’ organisational commitment is associated with nationality (South African and Australian) and that relationship is associated with their cultural beliefs (collectivism/individualism) and an environmental variable, perceived environmental uncertainty.This research is regarded as important in that multi-national organizations operating in different political and social environments may choose to use different means to ensure the maximum organisational commitment from their employees, in particular, those who are professional accountants.

Suggested Citation

  • B M Clayton & M R Hutchinson, 2002. "Organisational commitment of accountants in Australia and South Africa," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:16:y:2002:i:1:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2002.11435099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.2002.11435099
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.2002.11435099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:16:y:2002:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.