IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v7y2002i1p77-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accountability through Ethics Enhancement Strategies: Empirical Evidence from American Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Ann Feldheim
  • Xiaohu Wang

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between ethics enhancement strategies and accountability. Using data from a national survey of city managers, the authors find that the ethics enhancement strategies of role modeling, ethics development, and ethics enforcement and review may significantly increase accountability efforts in cities. This research supports the argument that ethics enhancement strategies increase accountability by improving public workers’ willingness to be open to public scrutiny.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Ann Feldheim & Xiaohu Wang, 2002. "Accountability through Ethics Enhancement Strategies: Empirical Evidence from American Cities," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 77-84, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:7:y:2002:i:1:p:77-84
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2002.10804994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2002.10804994
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2002.10804994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruhaya Atan & Md. Mahmudul Alam & Jamaliah Said, 2017. "Practices of corporate integrity and accountability of non-profit organizations in Malaysia," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 44(12), pages 2271-2286, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:7:y:2002:i:1:p:77-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.