IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v28y2023i3p380-401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence-inclusive communication: steering crisis leadership outcomes in Portugal, Brazil, New Zealand, and the US

Author

Listed:
  • Flavia M. M. Donadelli
  • Markus Luczak-Roesch
  • Ronald Fischer
  • Nancy Li

Abstract

While the essence of leadership communication is recognized as a linchpin in crisis management, the distinct characteristics that define successful communication are often unknown. Recent perspectives on the topic highlight the importance of incorporating political and value-based considerations to achieve a balanced communication style during a crisis. This article empirically tests these claims by examining whether an evidence-inclusive communication style of leadership tends to yield more successful outcomes in crisis management. We compare speeches by leaders from Portugal, Brazil, the United States, and New Zealand, to assess the main explicit knowledge and value bases of decision-making. Our findings suggest that success of a crisis response is associated with a leader’s ability to effectively communicate an evidence-based narrative, inclusive of different evidence sources, when tackling pressing and complex issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Flavia M. M. Donadelli & Markus Luczak-Roesch & Ronald Fischer & Nancy Li, 2023. "Evidence-inclusive communication: steering crisis leadership outcomes in Portugal, Brazil, New Zealand, and the US," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 380-401, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:28:y:2023:i:3:p:380-401
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2023.2246738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2023.2246738
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2023.2246738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:28:y:2023:i:3:p:380-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.