IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v27y2022i3p168-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Typologies of policymakers’ perception toward energy transition in Korea: philosophy and resources

Author

Listed:
  • Youhyun Lee
  • Minhyuk Cho
  • Hyung Jun Park

Abstract

Energy transition is a crucial process in fighting climate change. Most policymakers agree with its importance, however, they follow different approaches toward achieving energy transition. This study examines policymakers’ perceptions of dominant energy resources and their philosophy toward energy transition. The study employed the Q analysis, which is suitable for exploring policymakers’ perceptions. A total of four major environmental philosophies were identified, namely ecocentrism, technocentrism, preventism, and marketism. The analysis of the results concluded that four types of perceptions could be derived from the factor analysis. The most popular type of perception is based on the comprehensive attitude that combines environmental values, safety, and economy. Through the analysis, two crucial implications are suggested: the necessity of energy mix and the long-term feasibility of energy transition. The results of our analysis can serve as useful evidence for establishing a robust energy transition policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Youhyun Lee & Minhyuk Cho & Hyung Jun Park, 2022. "Typologies of policymakers’ perception toward energy transition in Korea: philosophy and resources," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 168-189, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:27:y:2022:i:3:p:168-189
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2022.2091738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2022.2091738
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2022.2091738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:27:y:2022:i:3:p:168-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.