IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v11y2006i1p71-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Patient Experiences in Medicaid and Commercial Health Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Minah Kang Kim

Abstract

Providing a good quality care for Medicaid patients has been a persistent challenge. To evaluate quality of care provided by Medicaid plans in comparison with that of commercial plans, this study used the CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Study) survey, which measured the experiences of patients using frequency report instead of traditional satisfaction measures that are more vulnerable to a response bias. This study found that Medicaid managed care services for children has not yet achieved the goals of providing access to and quality of care equivalent to that of commercial insurance. This study also confirmed potential problems in relying entirely on global ratings or satisfaction measures in assessing quality of care. While global ratings of Medicaid care were as good as and sometimes better than commercial counterparts, Medicaid patients reported worse access to necessary care. Based on the results, implications were drawn for future efforts in assessment and improvement of quality of care for Medicaid patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Minah Kang Kim, 2006. "Comparison of Patient Experiences in Medicaid and Commercial Health Plans," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 71-83, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:11:y:2006:i:1:p:71-83
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2006.10805079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2006.10805079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2006.10805079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:2418 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:11:y:2006:i:1:p:71-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.