IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v25y2018i1p49-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The origins of national housing finance systems: a comparative investigation into historical variations in mortgage finance regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Blackwell
  • Sebastian Kohl

Abstract

This paper advances the first historically informed typology of housing finance systems. Using a novel collection of historical mortgage-market data, we identify four different ‘ideal type’ systems, which developed in mature economies when organised housing finance institutions began to emerge with the advance of industrialism and urbanism throughout the long nineteenth century: informal person-to-person lending, and state lending as solutions outside specialised banking circuits; and deposit-based and bond-based institutions as banking solutions. We adapt Alexander Gerschenkron's economic backwardness thesis in order to explain the temporal and spatial emergence of these distinct types, arguing that these systems created path-dependent logics, which made their influence felt over a century later.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Blackwell & Sebastian Kohl, 2018. "The origins of national housing finance systems: a comparative investigation into historical variations in mortgage finance regimes," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 49-74, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:25:y:2018:i:1:p:49-74
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2017.1403358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2017.1403358
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2017.1403358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy Blackwell & Sebastian Kohl, 2018. "Urban heritages: How history and housing finance matter to housing form and homeownership rates," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3669-3688, December.
    2. Savage, Mike & Waitkus, Nora, 2022. "Property, wealth, and social change: Piketty as a social science engineer," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114939, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Engelbert Stockhammer & Christina Wolf, 2019. "Building blocks for the macroeconomics and political economy of housing," Japanese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1-2), pages 43-67, April.
    4. PROSKUROVSKA Anetta & DÖRRY Sabine, 2018. "Is a Blockchain-based conveyance system the next step in the financialisation of housing? The case of Sweden," LISER Working Paper Series 2018-17, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    5. Giorgos Gouzoulis, 2023. "What do indebted employees do? Financialisation and the decline of industrial action," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 71-94, January.
    6. Sebastian Kohl & Alexander Spielau, 2022. "Centring construction in the political economy of housing: variegated growth regimes after the Keynesian construction state," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 465-490.
    7. James Wood & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2020. "House prices, private debt and the macroeconomics of comparative political economy," Working Papers PKWP2005, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    8. Eva Horvatova, 2020. "Twenty Years of Mortgage Banking in Slovakia," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-30, September.
    9. Giorgos Gouzoulis, 2021. "Finance, Discipline and the Labour Share in the Long‐Run: France (1911–2010) and Sweden (1891–2000)," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 568-594, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:25:y:2018:i:1:p:49-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.