IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v24y2022i11p1779-1801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accountability intensity and bureaucrats’ response to conflicting expectations: a survey experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyan Tu
  • Ting Gong

Abstract

Grassroots bureaucrats are confronted with multiple accountability pressures which result in diverse or even conflicting expectations. Based on a survey experiment conducted in China, this study examines how bureaucrats respond to the divergent expectations of upper-level authorities and local citizens and how the intensity of such accountability influences those responses. The findings show that although bureaucrats tend to put more effort into tasks that are aligned with citizens’ interests, over-stringent accountability may crowd out their intrinsic motivation to serve the public and push them to follow top-down instructions mechanically. Intensified accountability may not necessarily lead to better policy outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyan Tu & Ting Gong, 2022. "Accountability intensity and bureaucrats’ response to conflicting expectations: a survey experiment in China," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 1779-1801, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:24:y:2022:i:11:p:1779-1801
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1930123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2021.1930123
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2021.1930123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:24:y:2022:i:11:p:1779-1801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.